BSPCE vs Token Grants for French Web3 Startups: Two Different Instruments (2026)

Payroll·

BSPCE vs Token Grants for French Web3 Startups: Two Different Instruments (2026)

A BSPCE is a French statutory equity-warrant regime with a specific tax treatment reformed by the 2025 Finance Act; a token grant is crypto-asset compensation with no bespoke standard. Not interchangeable: the instrument choice, the BSPCE conditions, and why it is an adviser question.
Author avatar Wag3s TeamEditorial team specializing in Web3 finance, crypto tax, and DAO operations. Based in Zurich, Switzerland.

Reviewed by Wag3s Editorial Team — verified against the BSPCE regime as reformed by the loi de finances pour 2025 (loi n° 2025-127 du 14 février 2025, art. 92) and BOFiP ACTU-2025-00124, with the loi de finances 2026 changes · Last reviewed May 2026

BSPCE vs Token Grants for French Web3 Startups

A French Web3 founder asking "should we give the team BSPCE or tokens?" is comparing two structurally different instruments, not two flavours of the same thing. One is a defined statutory regime with a known tax outcome; the other is crypto-asset compensation with no bespoke wrapper. This article is scoped narrowly to that French choice: how the BSPCE regime differs from a token grant, what the 2025 reform changed, and why eligibility is a question for counsel. For the wider design of a token grant itself, see the employee token grant structuring guide.

The distinction in brief

  • A BSPCE is a French statutory equity-warrant regime with strict issuer and beneficiary conditions and a defined personal-tax treatment.
  • A token grant is crypto-asset compensation with no bespoke standard; its accounting runs through the IFRS 2 vs IAS 19 scope question.
  • The two are not interchangeable: they carry different legal, tax, accounting, and dilution consequences.
  • The 2025 Finance Act (loi n° 2025-127 du 14 février 2025, art. 92) reformed the BSPCE regime, with new rules applying from 15 February 2025 and a split between the gain d'exercice and the gain net de cession.
  • The 2026 Finance Act lowered the individual-ownership threshold from 25% to 15% and extended BSPCE to sub-subsidiary staff.
  • The choice is a structuring decision, not a default. Confirm eligibility and treatment with French counsel.

Two different instruments

BSPCEToken grant
NatureFrench statutory equity warrant (right to subscribe shares)Crypto-asset compensation transfer
RegimeDefined conditions + specific personal-tax regimeNo bespoke statutory/accounting standard
AccountingEquity-instrument logicIFRS 2 vs IAS 19 scope question
PopulationQualifying company's employees/officersProtocol/token contributors

They solve different problems (equity upside in a qualifying French company versus protocol-token incentives) and are not substitutes.

The BSPCE regime after the 2025 reform

The loi de finances pour 2025 (loi n° 2025-127 du 14 février 2025, art. 92) reformed the BSPCE regime. The new rules apply to gains realised on a disposal, buy-back, redemption or cancellation of the securities from 15 February 2025. The reform distinguishes two gains:

  • the gain d'exercice, which is the value of the securities at subscription minus the exercise price;
  • the gain net de cession, which is the capital gain on resale.

For BSPCE subscribed since 1 January 2025, the avantage salarial is broadly taxed at a 12.8% income-tax forfait (roughly 30% including social levies), or at the progressive scale on option. These are precise, technical points set out in the BOFiP commentary (ACTU-2025-00124, BOI-RSA-ES-20-40-40). Confirm the specifics with a French adviser, and note that this is the 2025 position, distinct from the 2026 changes below.

Issuer and beneficiary conditions

Broadly, the issuer must be a société par actions (SA, SAS or SCA) that:

  • is not listed, or has a market capitalisation below €150 million;
  • is registered for less than fifteen years;
  • is subject to corporate income tax in France;
  • is held directly and continuously, to at least a defined threshold, by individuals.

The 2026 Finance Act lowered that individual-ownership threshold from 25% to 15% and extended the BSPCE perimeter to employees and officers of sub-subsidiaries, which helps startups after several funding rounds. The 2025-versus-2026 distinction matters: state which applies and confirm eligibility with counsel.

Why the choice matters

BSPCE is a defined regime with conditions, deadlines, and a known tax outcome. A token grant has no equivalent wrapper, and its treatment is jurisdiction- and arrangement-specific. Choosing a token grant where a BSPCE was intended forfeits the BSPCE regime; choosing BSPCE for a non-qualifying company or population is invalid. The decision drives dilution, tax, accounting (IFRS 2 vs IAS 19), and compliance. It is a structuring decision for advisers, not a default to assume.

Practical guidance

  1. Treat BSPCE and token grants as different instruments, never interchangeable.
  2. For a BSPCE, confirm the issuer and beneficiary conditions (SA/SAS/SCA, unlisted or below €150M, under fifteen years, corporate income tax in France, the ownership threshold).
  3. Apply the 2025 regime (from 15 February 2025; gain d'exercice versus gain net de cession) and the 2026 threshold and perimeter changes, keeping them distinct.
  4. For token grants, run the IFRS 2 vs IAS 19 scope question separately.
  5. Confirm the structure with a French avocat fiscaliste or expert-comptable.
  6. Document the chosen instrument and its basis for audit and the cap table.

Choosing an administration tool

A tool administers a BSPCE plan or a token-grant programme; it does not decide whether a BSPCE is the right instrument or whether your company qualifies. Those are counsel questions. When you evaluate one, check that it can:

  • represent BSPCE and token grants as distinct instruments, rather than collapsing them into a single "equity" record;
  • hold the documentation each needs (subscription terms and exercise price for a BSPCE; grant, vesting and reference value for a token grant);
  • keep the vesting and cap-table data in a form your expert-comptable can reconcile.

Platforms such as Toku and Liquifi administer token grants, vesting and token payroll, but none of them is a substitute for the BSPCE legal structuring itself.

Where Wag3s fits

Wag3s HR administers token-grant vesting and crypto payroll with the records and audit trail a French Web3 startup needs alongside its BSPCE plan, keeping the token-grant accounting (IFRS 2 versus IAS 19) and the cap-table and vesting data clean. The BSPCE eligibility analysis and the instrument choice itself remain decisions for a French avocat fiscaliste or expert-comptable; Wag3s supports that adviser's work rather than replacing it. See the HR product page.


Further reading

Sources

The 2026 individual-ownership threshold change (25% to 15%) and the extension to sub-subsidiary staff should be confirmed against the relevant 2026 Finance Act provisions with French counsel, as they are distinct from the 2025 reform above.

Editorial disclaimer
This article is informational and does not constitute legal or tax advice. The BSPCE regime is technical, French-specific, and was reformed for 2025/2026. Confirm eligibility and treatment with a French avocat fiscaliste or expert-comptable.