BSPCE vs Token Grants for French Web3 Startups: Two Different Instruments (2026)
BSPCE vs Token Grants for French Web3 Startups: Two Different Instruments (2026)
Reviewed by Wag3s Editorial Team — verified against the BSPCE regime as reformed by the loi de finances pour 2025 (loi n° 2025-127 du 14 février 2025, art. 92) and BOFiP ACTU-2025-00124, with the loi de finances 2026 changes · Last reviewed May 2026
BSPCE vs Token Grants for French Web3 Startups
A French Web3 founder asking "should we give the team BSPCE or tokens?" is comparing two structurally different instruments, not two flavours of the same thing. One is a defined statutory regime with a known tax outcome; the other is crypto-asset compensation with no bespoke wrapper. This article is scoped narrowly to that French choice: how the BSPCE regime differs from a token grant, what the 2025 reform changed, and why eligibility is a question for counsel. For the wider design of a token grant itself, see the employee token grant structuring guide.
The distinction in brief
- A BSPCE is a French statutory equity-warrant regime with strict issuer and beneficiary conditions and a defined personal-tax treatment.
- A token grant is crypto-asset compensation with no bespoke standard; its accounting runs through the IFRS 2 vs IAS 19 scope question.
- The two are not interchangeable: they carry different legal, tax, accounting, and dilution consequences.
- The 2025 Finance Act (loi n° 2025-127 du 14 février 2025, art. 92) reformed the BSPCE regime, with new rules applying from 15 February 2025 and a split between the gain d'exercice and the gain net de cession.
- The 2026 Finance Act lowered the individual-ownership threshold from 25% to 15% and extended BSPCE to sub-subsidiary staff.
- The choice is a structuring decision, not a default. Confirm eligibility and treatment with French counsel.
Two different instruments
| BSPCE | Token grant | |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | French statutory equity warrant (right to subscribe shares) | Crypto-asset compensation transfer |
| Regime | Defined conditions + specific personal-tax regime | No bespoke statutory/accounting standard |
| Accounting | Equity-instrument logic | IFRS 2 vs IAS 19 scope question |
| Population | Qualifying company's employees/officers | Protocol/token contributors |
They solve different problems (equity upside in a qualifying French company versus protocol-token incentives) and are not substitutes.
The BSPCE regime after the 2025 reform
The loi de finances pour 2025 (loi n° 2025-127 du 14 février 2025, art. 92) reformed the BSPCE regime. The new rules apply to gains realised on a disposal, buy-back, redemption or cancellation of the securities from 15 February 2025. The reform distinguishes two gains:
- the gain d'exercice, which is the value of the securities at subscription minus the exercise price;
- the gain net de cession, which is the capital gain on resale.
For BSPCE subscribed since 1 January 2025, the avantage salarial is broadly taxed at a 12.8% income-tax forfait (roughly 30% including social levies), or at the progressive scale on option. These are precise, technical points set out in the BOFiP commentary (ACTU-2025-00124, BOI-RSA-ES-20-40-40). Confirm the specifics with a French adviser, and note that this is the 2025 position, distinct from the 2026 changes below.
Issuer and beneficiary conditions
Broadly, the issuer must be a société par actions (SA, SAS or SCA) that:
- is not listed, or has a market capitalisation below €150 million;
- is registered for less than fifteen years;
- is subject to corporate income tax in France;
- is held directly and continuously, to at least a defined threshold, by individuals.
The 2026 Finance Act lowered that individual-ownership threshold from 25% to 15% and extended the BSPCE perimeter to employees and officers of sub-subsidiaries, which helps startups after several funding rounds. The 2025-versus-2026 distinction matters: state which applies and confirm eligibility with counsel.
Why the choice matters
BSPCE is a defined regime with conditions, deadlines, and a known tax outcome. A token grant has no equivalent wrapper, and its treatment is jurisdiction- and arrangement-specific. Choosing a token grant where a BSPCE was intended forfeits the BSPCE regime; choosing BSPCE for a non-qualifying company or population is invalid. The decision drives dilution, tax, accounting (IFRS 2 vs IAS 19), and compliance. It is a structuring decision for advisers, not a default to assume.
Practical guidance
- Treat BSPCE and token grants as different instruments, never interchangeable.
- For a BSPCE, confirm the issuer and beneficiary conditions (SA/SAS/SCA, unlisted or below €150M, under fifteen years, corporate income tax in France, the ownership threshold).
- Apply the 2025 regime (from 15 February 2025; gain d'exercice versus gain net de cession) and the 2026 threshold and perimeter changes, keeping them distinct.
- For token grants, run the IFRS 2 vs IAS 19 scope question separately.
- Confirm the structure with a French avocat fiscaliste or expert-comptable.
- Document the chosen instrument and its basis for audit and the cap table.
Choosing an administration tool
A tool administers a BSPCE plan or a token-grant programme; it does not decide whether a BSPCE is the right instrument or whether your company qualifies. Those are counsel questions. When you evaluate one, check that it can:
- represent BSPCE and token grants as distinct instruments, rather than collapsing them into a single "equity" record;
- hold the documentation each needs (subscription terms and exercise price for a BSPCE; grant, vesting and reference value for a token grant);
- keep the vesting and cap-table data in a form your expert-comptable can reconcile.
Platforms such as Toku and Liquifi administer token grants, vesting and token payroll, but none of them is a substitute for the BSPCE legal structuring itself.
Where Wag3s fits
Wag3s HR administers token-grant vesting and crypto payroll with the records and audit trail a French Web3 startup needs alongside its BSPCE plan, keeping the token-grant accounting (IFRS 2 versus IAS 19) and the cap-table and vesting data clean. The BSPCE eligibility analysis and the instrument choice itself remain decisions for a French avocat fiscaliste or expert-comptable; Wag3s supports that adviser's work rather than replacing it. See the HR product page.
Further reading
- Token Compensation Accounting: IFRS 2 or IAS 19?
- Token Vesting & Cliff Accounting
- BSPCE Eligibility Conditions 2026
- Web3 Payroll Guide
- Token Vesting Accounting
- Web3 Employee Token Grant Structuring
Sources
- Légifrance — LOI n° 2025-127 du 14 février 2025 de finances pour 2025, and article 92, which reforms the BSPCE regime for securities subscribed from 1 January 2025.
- BOFiP — ACTU-2025-00124, the administration's announcement of the BSPCE changes made by the 2025 Finance Act (gain d'exercice versus gain net de cession).
- BOFiP — BOI-RSA-ES-20-40-40, the tax regime and reporting obligations for shares subscribed through BSPCE exercise from 1 January 2025 (12.8% forfait, roughly 30% with social levies, or the progressive scale on option).
- IFRS — IFRS 2 Share-based Payment and IAS 19 Employee Benefits: the scope question for a token grant, which (unlike a BSPCE) has no bespoke standard. See the token compensation accounting article.
The 2026 individual-ownership threshold change (25% to 15%) and the extension to sub-subsidiary staff should be confirmed against the relevant 2026 Finance Act provisions with French counsel, as they are distinct from the 2025 reform above.
Crypto Treasury Segregation of Duties: No One Signs Their Own Payment (2026)
A multisig threshold is not segregation of duties. SoD separates who requests a payment, who approves it, who signs it, and who records it — so no single person can initiate and complete a transfer. The role split for a crypto treasury, why it is distinct from the threshold, and the audit-trail link.
Token Vesting & Cliff Accounting: Recognising the Expense Over the Schedule (2026)
Once a token grant is in IFRS 2 scope, the expense is recognised over the vesting period — a cliff does not delay it to the cliff date. Straight-line over the service period is common; graded vesting and forfeitures complicate it. The recognition mechanics, after scope is settled.
Every chain, integration, and competitor mentioned in this article gets its own page — coverage detail, comparison signals, and the audit trail your finance team needs.
- Chain
Ethereum
ERC-20, DeFi, gas, restaking — the largest ecosystem.
View page - Chain
Solana
SPL tokens, native stake, Jupiter, Metaplex NFTs.
View page - Integration
NetSuite integration
Mid-market and enterprise crypto subledger.
View page - Integration
QuickBooks integration
SMB GL with daily JE sync.
View page - Integration
Safe integration
DAO and corporate multi-sig accounting.
View page - Compare
Wag3s vs Cryptio
Side-by-side enterprise subledger comparison.
View page